This was a special wine dinner organized
by Peter's Wine Circle in 2004. We tasted this set of Bordeaux first growths
that evening, so as to make a comparison between them. This was occasioned by
the great fortune of being able to obtaining the above set at a reasonable
price. After a thorough reading of various books so as to arrange the wines in
ascending order of enjoyment, it was decided to taste the two Rothschilds first
- Lafite, followed by Mouton, followed by Margaux. It was undecided whether we
should have Latour or Haut-Brion next. After having a sniff at the corks and
the bottles, the order became Latour with Haut-Brion bringing up the rearguard
(ie right to left in the photo). Needless to say, that evening was immensely
enjoyable. Dessert was accompanied by a Guiraud of the same vintage.
My limited experience of first growth
clarets would also rank them fairly similarly. The Rothschilds are the most
variable. Lafite can be sublime in certain years, but really disappointing in
others. I had bad experiences with immense bottle variation within two cases of
the same Mouton 1994. Margaux is generally quite nice. Latour and Haut-Brion
are fairly consistent in their excellence, with one disappointment each in my
limited experience. The 1997 Latour (ie this one) was not at good as I
expected, but still 4 out of 5. The 1966 Haut-Brion (tasted at the Two
Centuries Dinner, the subject of a future blog) was initially very fine and
beat the Margaux 1966 hands down. However, it failed to develop much after
this. The Margaux probably suffered from some bottle stink, which marred first
impressions. It then blossomed in the glass and overtook Haut-Brion, turning
into a most memorable wine.
No comments:
Post a Comment